Frankly I don't see a requirement for uniformity or complete accuracy in human understanding, in order to say that the processes of humans at large are human processes and may be described as such. Also, the relationship between truth to humans is always that of infallible master to fallible student. Here is how A.W. Tozer explained that:
Has it ever occurred to you that one hundred pianos all tuned to the same fork are automatically tuned to each other? They are of one accord by being tuned, not to each other, but to another standard to which each one must individually bow. So one hundred worshipers [meeting] together, each one looking away to Christ, are in heart nearer to each other than they could possibly be, were they to become 'unity' conscious and turn their eyes away from God to strive for closer fellowship.
But have we all acceded at least that human thought is not the stuff of language? If so, I do also suggest a stroll through this: (on what science and the study of God are each suitable for).
There is another truth available to those with subtle hearing. When a piano is moved its tuning changes. Imagine 6 billion pianos in various conditions and various states of repair and use moving constantly.
Previously, I said: You brought up the phrase I AM which God gives to Moses as a "nickname" for Himself. It is a profound sentence and a most excellent way to begin meditation and worship - to enter the domain of thought where language fails. to which you replied Right on. That's where it begins.
Thank you for your agreement! I made a subtle misstatement but upon a reread, it was more accurate so I left it in. First I referred to I AM as a “phrase” which is the way God gave it to Moses, a nickname for Himself. In the second usage, I called it a “sentence” which it is. Moreover, it is the relevant sentence and that very completeness is what begins the meditation or worship!