[Abe Froman]

"The notion that wars are inconsistent to the beliefs inherent in both the Old Testament's call for the beating of swords into plowshares[4h] and Jesus' own admonition to his followers not to resist evil has never been of concern to Christian rulers[4i]."

This guy really likes to pick and choose. How about these? (In Jesus own words)

Matthew 10:34
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword."

Luke 22

35 Then Jesus asked them, "When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?"
"Nothing," they answered.
36 He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.

[ConservativeDude]

When one's fundamental commitment is to liberalism and then secondarily to Christianity, all sorts of wildly inaccurate results are inevitable.

But if you flush all the liberalism - and incidentally any secular conservatism - and read Scripture as best you can without your preconceived notions - then you are getting back to Biblical Christianity.

That is not to say that Biblical Christianity is simple or easily summarized...but I do know one thing for sure: Biblical Christianity is profoundly different from liberalism and it turns my stomach when the socialists try to capture Christianity for their evil purposes.