Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: prisoner6; vetvetdoug; Judith Anne; Mother Abigail; CathyRyan; per loin; Dog Gone; Petronski; ...
This would seem to be consistent with the earlier story that cats can be infected by SARS but do not have symptoms. If the SARS virus's natural host is the civet cat, very likely it can live in the civet without doing any harm to it.
13 posted on 05/23/2003 4:55:04 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
Would you put me on your SARS ping list,please?

From what I've read,it looks like the civet is pretty closely related to felines but still not in the same family.

If cats can spread SARS...

15 posted on 05/23/2003 5:04:35 AM PDT by Free Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: All
Sars link to civet cats 'a significant breakthrough'.
16 posted on 05/23/2003 5:05:22 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
"This would seem to be consistent with the earlier story that cats can be infected by SARS but do not have symptoms. "

Just great! Sheez...

22 posted on 05/23/2003 5:31:54 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
If the SARS virus's natural host is the civet cat, very likely it can live in the civet without doing any harm to it.

This could be a very important development. If confirmed, it tells us where the natural reservoir of the virus is, and that if we eliminate the disease in humans, the virus still exists in nature.

I think it goes without saying that the use of civet cats as human food should be immediately banned.

34 posted on 05/23/2003 7:31:45 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson