O'Reilly has broken the first rule for LA Times readers, NEVER READ Scheer's columns unless you want to ruin your day.
The Times is so liberal I think they sometimes write the letters to the editor, just to enhance their editorial opinions, just my suspicion based on years of observation.
The OP ED page has NO regular conservative contributors. Occasionally they run a George Will column, one of which they committed a NO-NO on and actually EDITED a Will OP ED because they DIDN'T LIKE something he said about their BUBBA BOY. Of course much to their chagrin we heard about it on talk radio because other papers printed Will's OP ED as written.
I start many mornings fuming at this newspaper, they show NO SIGN of even attempting to be even handed in anything they do, not just the editorials.
They've gone so far out that they recently gave their Book Award to a screed advocating adult sex with children.
After days of front page whining about the "museum disaster" in Baghdad, they FINALLY just a few days ago confirmed, 11 pages in not on the front page, what we all now know, that it was basically a HOAX, not true. It took them at least TWO WEEKS after the truth came out to even mention it.
These are the things that happen when there is no competition. I would pay DOUBLE for a newspaper I could feel good about supporting. I know I could live without the LA Times but I feel somewhat obligated to keep an eye on them.
These are the things that happen when there is no competition. I would pay DOUBLE for a newspaper I could feel good about supporting. I know I could live without the LA Times but I feel somewhat obligated to keep an eye on them.