[proud_2_B_texasgal]

><> All she showed me today is that she could never compete on Tour. <><

And all those men that ARE competing on the Tour that finished under her have showed you what?

[Bob J]

When someone talks of competing, I think they mean consistently finishing in the top 10-15 with a win here and there.

Competitive means threatening to lead and win, not missing cuts.

[r9etb]

And all those men that ARE competing on the Tour that finished under her have showed you what?

LOL! It's fun to watch the stammering, isn't it? After today, Sorenstam has proven she can play with the boys for one round, at least.

The truth of the matter is probably that it's highly unlikely that a woman can beat the top male golfers. I'd guess that men and women are equally capable when it comes to the short game, but that they'd lose at the long game, because they can't hit it as far. It's also true that Annika Sorenstam is probably as good or better than a lot of the men on the PGA tour.

If she wants to make money, though, she should stay in the LPGA.