Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meenie
I weould rather see the Dems take it to Court, challenging Senate rules, than the GOP take it to court challenging the filibuster. That would be a disaster. Let them be the ones resorting to the courts in an effort to overturn the will of the majority Constitutionally exercised. That would be a nice issue for the GOP, I think.
8 posted on 05/21/2003 11:04:47 AM PDT by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: BeerIsGood
Your idea has a fatal flaw, IMO, though I am not legally qualified to say so. That flaw, it seems to me, is that in order to have a nominee for the SC there first must be a vacancy. The ones talking about leaving are moderates and conservatives. That means that if a Constitutional challenge was made it would be heard by a partial court with liberals in the majority. We know how that will turn out. What I don't know is whether or not the court can convene without a full compliment.
9 posted on 05/21/2003 11:11:14 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson