That makes no sense. Bush won the election. The SCOTUS didn't hand it to him.
I know that Bush won--I'm just suggesting what the "sore loser" Democrats have been implying ever since the 2000 election--that the presidency WAS handed to him. I don't agree with them of course, but I was merely pointing out what I thought their counter-response would be.
By the way, I like the response given in post #16, to this question.