Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly-Discovered Star may be Third-Closest
spaceref.com ^ | 21 May 03 | staff

Posted on 05/21/2003 9:16:02 AM PDT by RightWhale

Newly-Discovered Star may be Third-Closest

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

The local celestial neighborhood just got more crowded with a discovery of a star that may be the third closest to the Sun. The star, "SO25300.5+165258," is a faint red dwarf star estimated to be about 7.8 light-years from Earth in the direction of the constellation Aries.

"Our new stellar neighbor is a pleasant surprise, since we weren't looking for it," said Dr. Bonnard Teegarden, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. Teegarden is lead author of a paper announcing the discovery to be published by the Astrophysical Journal. This work has been done in close collaboration with Dr. Steven Pravdo of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

If its estimate of distance is confirmed, the newfound star will be the Sun's third-closest stellar neighbor, slightly farther than the Alpha Centauri system, actually a group of three stars a bit more than four light-years away, and Barnard's star, about six light-years away. One light-year is almost six trillion miles, or nearly 9.5 trillion kilometers.

The new star has only about seven percent of the mass of the Sun, and it is 300,000 times fainter. The star's feeble glow is the reason why it has not been seen until now, despite being relatively close.

"We discovered this star in September 2002 while searching for white dwarf stars in an unrelated program," said Teegarden. The team was looking for white dwarf stars that move rapidly across the sky. Celestial objects with apparent rapid motion are called High Proper Motion objects. An object of this type can be discovered in successive images of an area of sky because it noticeably shifts its position while its surroundings remain fixed. Since either a distant star moving quickly or a nearby star moving slower can exhibit the same High Proper Motion, astronomers must use other measurements to determine its distance from Earth.

During its star search, the team used the SkyMorph database for NASA's Near Earth Asteroid Tracking program, to search for asteroids that might be on a collision course for Earth. Pravdo is project manager of the asteroid tracking program and is principal investigator for SkyMorph, which was separately supported by NASA's Applied Information Systems Research Program. Like High Proper Motion stars, asteroids reveal themselves when they shift their position against background stars in successive images. Automated telescopes scan the sky, accumulating thousands of images for the Near Earth Asteroid Tracking program, which have been incorporated into SkyMorph, a web-accessible database, for use in other types of astronomical research.

Once the star revealed itself in the Near Earth Asteroid Tracking images, the team found other images of the same patch of sky to establish a rough distance estimate by a technique called trigonometric parallax. This technique is used to calculate distances to relatively close stars. As Earth progresses in its orbit around the Sun, the position of a nearby star will appear to shift compared to background stars much farther away -- the larger the shift, the closer the star.

The team refined their initial distance estimate with another technique called photometric parallax. They used the 3.5-meter (11.5 feet) Astrophysical Research Consortium telescope at the Apache Point observatory, Sunspot, N.M., to observe the star and separate its light into its component colors for analysis. This allowed the team to determine what kind of star it is. The analysis indicates it's similar to a red dwarf star (spectral type M6.5) that's shining by fusing hydrogen atoms in its core, like our Sun (called a main sequence star).

Once the type of star is known, its true brightness, called intrinsic luminosity, can be determined. Since all light-emitting objects appear dimmer as distance from them increases, the team compared how bright the new star appeared in their images to its intrinsic luminosity to improve their distance estimate.

Although the star resembles a M6.5 red dwarf, it actually appears three times dimmer than expected for this kind of star at the initial distance estimate of 7.8 light-years. The star could therefore really be farther than the rough trigonometric distance indicates; or, if the initial estimate holds, it could have unusual properties that make it shine less brightly than typical M6.5 red dwarfs. A more precise measurement of the new star's position to establish an improved trigonometric parallax distance is underway at the U.S. Naval Observatory. This will confirm or refute its status as one of our closest neighbors by late this year. Either way, we might get even more company soon: "Since the survey only covered a band of the sky (about 25 degrees in declination), it is entirely possible that other faint nearby objects remain to be discovered," said Teegarden.

In addition to Teegarden and Pravdo, the team includes Dr. Thomas McGlynn of Goddard Space Flight Center; Dr. Michael Hicks and Dr. Stuart Shaklan of JPL; Dr. Suzanne Hawley, Kevin Covey and Oliver Fraser, of the University of Washington, Seattle; and Dr. Iann Reid of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md. An image and more information are available at .NASA.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Technical
KEYWORDS: alphacentauri; barnardsstar; so253005165258
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: biblewonk
It was an article in Astronomy magazine a couple years back.
And he was smug in stating that they'd mapped absolutely everything within several lightyears and there couldn't possibly be anything left out there. (Or words to that effect.)

I chuckled my butt off about it.
Did have a hard time figuring out their definition of a 'couple' of lightyears.
But since they'd mentioned Barnard's Star, I took it to mean out to ten at most.

Makes one wonder why some of those guys are even in the field anyway. If some of them are so sure there isn't anything close in to find anymore...
Nothing would surprise me anymore, with the universe.
I wouldn't be surprised to find that our solar system has a brown dwarf in it way out there.
I also wouldn't be surprised to find out that the oort cloud is quite real and slightly larger than they initially figured.
21 posted on 05/21/2003 1:28:58 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Had heard that there was one in the blue sky idea area, but hadn't heard that there was serious backing and planning being done.
Thanks for the link.
22 posted on 05/21/2003 1:33:14 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
So we cannot even see the NEARBY stuff????

Nearsighted astronomers.
23 posted on 05/21/2003 1:36:01 PM PDT by gitmo (THEN: Give me Liberty or give me Death. NOW: Take my Liberty so I can't hurt Myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
New Horizons is scheduled for launch in January 2006, with Jupiter Gravity Assist in 2007, and arrival in mid-2015/2016 (depending on launch vehicle).

NH will feature an optical/IR camera, a UV spectrometer (ALICE -- one of my current assignments), a couple of particle experiments, a radio "telescope", and a dust counter.

Critical Design Review for the whole project is later this summer. After that, it's free sailing as long as the environmentalist whackos don't hold up the RTGs (plutonium power plants).

MD
24 posted on 05/21/2003 1:39:38 PM PDT by MikeD (Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
I seem to remember the environuts protesting 'nukes' in space recently.
So they might hold up the powerplants some.
25 posted on 05/21/2003 1:42:52 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
For better or for worse radioactive materials can only be launched via Executive Order. However, between the fact that the President is from Texas (home of Southwest Research Institute) and NH will have no Earth fly-bys, there should be no problems launching the plutonium power plants.

The sad thing is that no nuclear reactions occur on the spacecraft -- the heat released by radioactive decay drives the generators.

MD
26 posted on 05/21/2003 1:47:34 PM PDT by MikeD (Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
Well, no Earth fly bys would be a major selling point.
The Press played it up with Galileo that it's powerplant would scatter "deadly" radiation over a portion of Earth should it accidentally de-orbit back when it made it's fly by.
27 posted on 05/21/2003 1:57:01 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
Heck, we haven't done much science with the far side of the Moon yet...

That was thoroughly researched by a team of crack British Space Scientists from Cambridge in the early '70's. They were known as "Pink Floyd".

;-)

28 posted on 05/21/2003 2:02:55 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I have a book, I think it's the one called galaxies which states that galaxies are very evenly distributed throughout the universe. This was great because the even distribution worked perfectly with the big bang theory. What a shock to find that their distrubution is anything but even/homogenous.

It is also very interesting to study just how we figure out the distances to the various objects in the universe. Parallax is by far the most accurate and from then on it becomes more speculative.

29 posted on 05/21/2003 2:08:33 PM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
The Press played it up with Galileo

Also Michio Kaku, physicist. Don't know how he expects us to get to be a Type One civilization without doing some of these things.

30 posted on 05/21/2003 2:14:06 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Yes, I think I know which book you are talking about.
They were VERY surprised to find that there's "Bubbles" and "walls" out there.
Very funny, actually.
Just goes to show how very little we understand the very environs we live in as well.

"Man is such an amusing creature." -quote author unknown.
31 posted on 05/21/2003 2:15:00 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Maybe he thinks we'll be an evil civ bent on galactic conquest.
(Would be cool, though.)
32 posted on 05/21/2003 2:23:21 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
we'll be an evil civ bent on galactic conquest

Aside from the fact that we own the galaxy by birthright, we're not evil. No way.

Bwahahahahaha

33 posted on 05/21/2003 2:25:17 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I'd like to be the first to discover sentient ices, and eat them like Carvel ice cream.

But that's me and my sense of humor.
34 posted on 05/21/2003 2:30:21 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Would it be mean to suggest that Syd might have visited?

Yeah, probably. I feel bad for Syd...

MD
35 posted on 05/21/2003 3:09:18 PM PDT by MikeD (Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
There was that epi of South Park where the tv producer appeared as a taco that cr@pped ice cream. Close enough?
36 posted on 05/21/2003 3:17:33 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
Hmmm..
True enough.
A sentient taco is too close to what already exists near where I live, though.
37 posted on 05/21/2003 3:31:07 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
Would it be mean to suggest that Syd might have visited?

From what I can gather, Syd was in another galaxy, not just on the backside of the moon.

Floyd trivia: Syd unexpectedly walked into the recording studio (after many years) just as the band finished recording "Shine on You Crazy Diamond", which they wrote in honor of him as the founder of the group. Weird.

38 posted on 05/21/2003 4:21:32 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; Simcha7; expat; babylonian
We discovered this star in September 2002 while searching for white dwarf stars in an unrelated program," said Teegarden.


39 posted on 05/21/2003 4:37:21 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson