Skip to comments.
Plan to Capture Bin Laden Before 9/11 Was Called Off
ABC News ^
| 5/21/03
| Brian Ross
Posted on 05/21/2003 6:01:14 AM PDT by Interloper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Interloper
Add this to Mansoor Ijaz's story, and you have the makings of one hell of a campaign stump speech, about why Democrats are unfit to govern.
2
posted on
05/21/2003 6:04:23 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Interloper
Hmm. Janet Reno killed it. Surprise, surprise.
To: Thane_Banquo
I doubt she made any significant decisions without consulting Clinton first, at least one of them.
To: rockinonritalin
No decision that important is made OUTSIDE of the Oval Office.
5
posted on
05/21/2003 6:06:57 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Interloper
killed by then-Attorney General Janet RenoWhy couldn't the nasty old hag kill THIS one? But NOOOO...terrorists got a free ride while little kids died.
6
posted on
05/21/2003 6:07:42 AM PDT
by
petuniasevan
(I'm hitting the control key but it's not giving me any!)
To: Interloper
By golly, it's a good thing there are a bunch of Clinton books coming out soon to spin the truth about his pathetic administration.
7
posted on
05/21/2003 6:07:56 AM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Thane_Banquo
Considering the Reno was continuously taking the blame for Waco, I am not surprised that she was gun shy about another projected surgical strike. It's also worth remembering how many other time US intelligence about the whereabouts of Bin Ladin, Ghaddafi, Saddam, etc., had been wrong.
8
posted on
05/21/2003 6:08:09 AM PDT
by
DonQ
To: Interloper
"...this plan was probably too dangerous, that the loss of life on the ground would have been significant." In hindsight, leaving him there was too dangerous, and lead to a real significant loss of life.
9
posted on
05/21/2003 6:09:16 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
To: hobbes1
What was Mansoor's story? I think I missed his latest.
To: Interloper
Clinton was probably waiting for another intern problem he could use military action for, so we would be distracted yet again.
11
posted on
05/21/2003 6:10:37 AM PDT
by
yonif
To: DonQ
Its for the children.................oops sorry that was Waco!
12
posted on
05/21/2003 6:11:24 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: Interloper
Wonder if this is the story that slick willie was referring to when he said he didn't allow the attack because OBL was surrounded by 200 women and children.
If we have any luck at all, these stories will be the undoing of the grifter regime much as the NYT is melting down before our eyes.
13
posted on
05/21/2003 6:11:47 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: Interloper
To: Interloper
"They came to the decision that this plan was probably too dangerous, that the loss of life on the ground would have been significant," Cloonan said. There was concern that people around the bin Laden compound would be killed." In a Democrat administration, only Americans and Balkans at the discretion of Europe are allowed to die.
To: Interloper
not the latest, just his particular story, 3 deals with the Sudan to extradite OBL....quashed by the administration.
16
posted on
05/21/2003 6:13:36 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Thane_Banquo
Hmm. Janet Reno killed it. Surprise, surprise.There weren't enough children in the compound to make it worth her while.
17
posted on
05/21/2003 6:13:42 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: DonQ
Reno had no problem authorizing men in black carrying rifles to enter the home of a little Cuban boy named Elian. The people sitting and praying outside the home were sprayed with tear gas and terrorized.
A little boy, so much more dangerous to our national security than Osama Ben Laden.
What say you, democrats who elected this scum, twice.
18
posted on
05/21/2003 6:13:51 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: Interloper
Plan to Capture Bin Laden Before 9/11 Was Called Off The leftstream media are at it again!
This headline makes it appear as if it was President Bush that called off an attempt to get OBL.
It is only when one reads the article you learn it was a plan FIVE YEARS AGO, when the Unmentionable One was President.
Dispicable media spin.
To: Interloper
Plan to Capture Bin Laden Before 9/11 Was Called Off Typical twisted ABC headline. Makes it sound like this happened just before 9/11, implicating the current administration. It's not until far down in the article that it's clear that this was under Clinton's watch.
No, there's no bias in the "mainstream media"
20
posted on
05/21/2003 6:14:20 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson