Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
"It's all relative. But a 40 yr. never married man looking for a procreative partner will be looking at the younger babes, not the mature ones. "

I don't know many 40-year-old men who have never been married. The ones I do know don't seem like they'd be too good a catch to me, especially for a 20-something. Think about it.

I think 20-somethings are cute, funny, and pretty bad choices as marriage partners. When I remarried at 46, after a divorce, I didn't even think about anyone under 30. My wife was 35 then, and is still as beautiful to me as ever at 46.

71 posted on 05/21/2003 8:42:57 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: MineralMan
They are out there, in increasing numbers, the male cohorts of the careerists who wouldn't marry them when they where all younger. Now the shoe is on the other foot.

Also, many men don't marry because milk is free these days, but at 40, suddenly realize marriage and family is where is at. They don't shop in their own age range.

Women who think they can keep all their options open indefinitely are fools. But this is the mantra of feminism.

73 posted on 05/21/2003 8:56:48 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Impeach the 9th! Please!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson