[MineralMan]

""I'd take a 35-year-old over a 20-year-old any day of the week as a partner."

As a sex partner or a marriage partner? "

Either. I'm 57 years old, and have no time for daffy 20-somethings. They're decorative, but that's it.

[KKing]

I knew a 58 year old man married to a 28 year old woman, it was uncomfortable at times on the social scene, I can understand your preference.

That being said, I still feel single women in their mid 30s naturally have a more baggage than those in their early 20s.

[Valpal1]

It's all relative. But a 40 yr. never married man looking for a procreative partner will be looking at the younger babes, not the mature ones. And the mid life divorced men who have teen kids aren't looking for a 30-40 something desirous of starting a family.

When women wait too long past the crest of the wave, they have seriously compromised their chances for becoming married with children.

The feminists are lying through their teeth to girls, advising to put family off for 10-20 yrs of careering and carousing. Women aren't Men and all the feminist ranting and whining in the world won't change it.

Husbands and babies really is the best, most fulfilling life choice for the avarage and psychologically normal woman.

It isn't your boss or board of directors that will visit you in the old folks home

[wardaddy]

I would to at 57...but the 20 year old could drop by on occasion...lol....if I were single.

This article is about men choosing reproductive partners outta the gate...not old dogs like you and I "hunting".