Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zavien Doombringer
I think the author's point was this: You have two people age 35, a man and a woman. They both want to settle down. The man has his pick of all women age 18 to 99. The woman has her pick of men age 35 to 99.

Older people have more monetary assets. The fact that the 35 year-old man has more money than a 20 year-old man will make the 35 year-old more attractive to women, all things being equal. The fact that the 35 year-old woman has more money than the 20 year-old woman matters not at all to the men who may be interested in her. In fact, a woman would do well to shy away from a man who was interested in her money. So, while men may improve their chances of finding a mate by waiting until their 30's, women degrade their chances of finding a mate at that age.

The fact is that today's mating strategies hurt women tremendously. Even positing that the 35 year-old woman finds a husband, her fertility is quite precarious at that age. At age 35, a woman has a 1 in 400 chance of giving birth to a child with Down's syndrome. At 25 her risk is less than 1 in 2,000.

The age in which a woman first conceives and gives birth also affects fertility. Women who have children in their 20's have a longer fertile life-span than women who wait until they are in their 30's. If you don't use it, you will lose it. The reason why this has been all of the news is the explosion of women seeking fertility treatment. They are crying the blues because their grandmothers had children throughout their 40's, so they thought they could, too. However, their grandmothers also started having children in their early 20's.

Women and men are programmed to seek different things. Women seek stability and financial security from their mates. Men seek a pleasing and nuturing demeanor. All things considered, men get better (more wealthy) as they age. Women's fertility declines as she ages, which means she is the loser when trying to play the same game as a man when they are both in their 30's.

27 posted on 05/21/2003 6:43:39 AM PDT by Under the Radar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Under the Radar
]I think the author's point was this: You have two people age 35, a man and a woman. They both want to settle down. The man has his pick of all women age 18 to 99. The woman has her pick of men age 35 to 99.

Hardly. Lots of younger men go for older women these days.

30 posted on 05/21/2003 6:48:27 AM PDT by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Under the Radar
I have to agree with your analogy. But in my case, I have never been/loved another woman and never looked for one. My wife and I dated all through High School and married 2 years after. I had enlisted in the Air Force to be able to support her and a family. When I saw her in world history in 9th grade, I heard a voice say, "She's the one I have set for you." I believe a true match made in heaven! It wasn't looks (though she is beautiful), It wasn't money and it wasn't about fertility. To me it was about not having to go through life alone.
32 posted on 05/21/2003 6:49:27 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (If common sense is so common, why is it so difficult to find it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Under the Radar
However, their grandmothers also started having children in their early 20's

or mid teens.

Here in NW FL in the 5Os the fisherfolk would often marry off their 13-14 year old daughters to older widowers who owned their homes and boats. The wife would give him a couple of kids and become a comfortable widow in her 2Os or 3Os who might then marry a man closer to her own age.

65 posted on 05/21/2003 8:11:56 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson