To: pinz-n-needlez
You must be working for snotty's defence.
To: joyce11111
I'm thinking the same thing.
284 posted on
05/21/2003 3:53:46 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: joyce11111
Because I'm trying to follow the information that is posted and to make sense of it? Good gracious!
I don't see any way that Amber participated in Laci's death, from what we know.
I think Geragas is blowing as much smoke as possible to confuse the case against his client.
To: joyce11111; All
It was printed in the tabloids and I assume Allred will file a slander suit if untrue. Irrespective, I doubt it will ever come into evidence because SP stated that he had not told AF he was married.In otherwords, there is nothing to impeach.It is hearsay. The fact SP told AF he was unmarried might be admissible as to his state of mind.The fact AF dated married men is totally irrelevant to the instant case. Probably not even relevant in family law case in a jurisdction such as California which is no fault.
290 posted on
05/21/2003 4:03:14 PM PDT by
iaf97
To: joyce11111; All
You must be working for snotty's defence. You know, I noticed that Alred took Amber's case and then suddenly this place is teeming with people who are *shocked* at the very *notion* of suspecting that Amber would *ever* do *anything* wrong, and already smearing posters who disagree, laying out vague innuendos about unnamed posters(it could be anybody) sending offensive FReepmail, and now someone "must be working for snotty's defence."
Please.
I does make me wonder who is working for whom.
294 posted on
05/21/2003 4:11:18 PM PDT by
Yeti
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson