Replies

"It has answered MANY questions, Micrevolution happens ALL the time, this has been scientifically verified time after time...

...Fossil evidence is getting neck deep, and the "transitionals" that creationists keep complaining about are showing up more and more

"Micro-evolution," which IS provable, is a far, FAR cry from "transitional," which is hardly "neck-deep," evidence-wise.

Herein lies the problem -- Darwinists like yourself delusionally believe you are rounding third and heading home, when the truth of the matter actually lies somewhere between the batters' box and first base.

We have never claimed that science has all the answers, You are the ones that are demanding answers.

Of course the answers that evolution does answer are misrepresented and twisted by creationists in order to refute it.

Well, if you have to twist it in order to refute it, I believe the creationists have a problem.

I am going to say this again.

Evolution is science

Creationism is religion

One is based on scientific evidence, the other is based on faith in a book.

2 different animals.

If you wish to have creationism taught in public schools, get a philosophy class going, if you wish to disrupt evolution, then use science and come up with a better theory.

Sounds pretty simple to me.

Don't like evolution or it's explanations, then come up with a BETTER SCIENTIFIC theory to explain the evidence.

But to use creationism(religion) to disprove evolution(science) is just silly. Actually, it is downright laughable.