Replies

There has been no exception observed at this point.

Then you admit the law of biogenesis is indeed a law. That is the right answer.

What kind of silly trap is that?

It's called logic. Sorry if you think it's a trap.

No, it has NOT been observed, but it has obviously occurred at least once.

If it has not been observed, if it violates an existing law, and if it cannot be reproduced in a laboratory, how can it be obvious? That's not science and you clamed to be scientific.

"Goddidit" is not good enough for me, but, that statement for some reason gives you comfort.

But "iddidititself" is good enough for you. I don't think you quite comprehend the implications of your belief.

Have a ball with it, just don't claim that it is science.

If you could understand the implications of your belief, you would come to realize that "itdidititself" is not science either. You must not comprehend that since you seem to think spontaneous generation is science.

But that's OK. Believe what you want-- only don't pretend it's science when it's superstition. Don't pretend it's logical when it's nothing more than wishful thinking.

I never pretended otherwise, but I noticed that you took out the part of my post that you did not like.

the "I don't know" part, but "I don't know" is really something that you don't want to deal with, or can deal with.

But "iddidititself" is good enough for you. I don't think you quite comprehend the implications of your belief

No, again, "I don't Know" is quite alright with me, there are some theories out there, but they are conjecture, no real scientific evidence at this point.

That is why I say I DON'T KNOW.

"But 'iddidititself' is good enough for you. I don't think you quite comprehend the implications of your belief."

Hey DM -- Spiritually we realize this "implication" can only be accepted once man rejects satan's lie;

Scientifically, the Darwinist insistance on scientific impossibilies as "provable" just negates totally the integrity of such individuals, while indeed "proving" a political/religious agenda instead.