Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
"You conveniently forgot to point out that the shroud was repaired during the Middle Ages after being damaged in a fire, and that the earlier tests may have been of the medieval material."

Actually, the atheist, pseudo scientists claimed that the shroud could be no more than 800 years old. PBS was only too pleased to broadcast these "scientific findings". But more recent tests, including DNA and other methods, have proved the Shroud to be at least 1,900 years old. Among many other findings, they found mold spores embedded in the Shroud from plants that are native only to Israel. And the scientists who did their "tests" in 1994 said the Shroud probably never left France and Italy. Seems they were wrong not only about its age, but also about its place of origin. Funny, isn't it, how the evolutionist "scientists" seem to discover what they were looking for in the first place. And no matter how many times they get proven wrong they maintain their arrogance. And here I was thinking that scientists were supposed to have open minds.

303 posted on 05/21/2003 7:18:22 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: TheCrusader
You cannot DNA test a piece of cloth, other than to tell what it's made of. It would have nothing to do with dating. You appear to be mixing apples and oranges. You might want to do a little web research before continuing along your lines of reasoning.
307 posted on 05/21/2003 7:45:06 PM PDT by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson