[Aric2000]

bubber?

Is that a word that you made up just for me?

Isn't that sweet.

Hey, I couldn't care less if someone is a creationist, fine with me, but when they claim that their religious myth shoould replace a scientific theory, or claims that it somehow has more clout, I find it loathsome, and arrogant.

It is a myth, it is a story, it is a morality tale, nothing more, nothing less.

It is religion, and if you fight science with religion, expect science to fight back.

BUT, if you use science, REAL science, and not this ID crap, then you might actually make some headway, though I seriously doubt it.

Be a creationist, fine, but don't shove it down my kids throat at a public school, and don't try to disprove evolution with it.

It's religion, deal with it.

[ALS]

I never said a "religious myth" should replace a "scientific theory".

Again, you auto-assigned all these whacky hate Godisms to me because I called your sillyass theory, Crap.

Like I said, that's your m.o..

If you can't reposition the opposition into a pew somewhere, you're simply lost with what to do with yourself.

I think this pretty much sums up my point:
Aric2000 said-
"Be a creationist, fine, but don't shove it down my kids throat at a public school, and don't try to disprove evolution with it."

keep digging it bubber...