Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother
You left out a lie. They also showed an AK defeating body armor. Any rifle will defeat the body armor they used! Rifles that weren't banned will defeat body armor as readily as any of the banned guns. Body armor is designed to protect against handguns; not rifles.
59 posted on 05/20/2003 1:15:42 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
OMG, you're right.

Even the NATO body armor is touch-and-go on .308 Win/7.62 NATO. And it's got steel plates in it and weighs a good 12 pounds.

I know some standard pistols (e.g. .44 Mag) will defeat standard Class II body armor. Even Class III is not proof against some custom pistols and protects against very few rifles. (Do you know which one they used? Class I junk would be par for the course with CNN.)

62 posted on 05/20/2003 1:19:13 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson