Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin
It just irks me when other pro-gun groups take the NRA's refutation of the gunophobes lies and twist that to mean that the NRA supports gun control... this bill would not be expiring at all if the NRA hadn't lobbied to have a time limit included, but that was twisted to mean that they supported the bill.

There are a lot of people on the RKBA side who have an all-or-nothing attitude. There's a time and place for such thinking, but at other times, you have to compromise. It was better to lose our rights for 10 years rather than permenantly.

Fighting every last jot and tittle of the law would have cost us everything. Politically, killing the bill off just wasn't going to happen. Clinton had done a good job of whipping up public sentiment to pass a law. The NRA could have had a part in writing the law, as they did, or they could have left that task to Feinstein and Schumer. Some of the purists act as though they'd have prefered the latter.

52 posted on 05/20/2003 12:50:34 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
"It was better to lose our rights for 10 years rather than permenantly."

Oh, brother. Hard to remember a more inane statement made by a freeper with a straight face. With friends like you, who needs liberals?

77 posted on 05/20/2003 8:29:32 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson