Let's recap and then on to incest.
You think that states have powers granted by the 9th amendment that supercede individual rights. I say no and use the 9th to say that the founders knew that there were more rights they did not address.
You say you can have sex with your animals because they are your property. I say no, because they cannot consent to it. I know you will be writing your representative to get all the laws protecting animals stricken from the books, since they violate your rights.
While you believe you can have sex with your animals you deny that humans have the right to have se with other humans. This puts you in an interesting position regarding sexual activity. Pun intended.
I did some reading on incest this morning for the first time since college. As you know I was concerned about the implications for any children resulting from such a union.
Speaking of children, can I safely say that we agree that they cannot give consent to sex? I say they can't and I'll proceed under that position. So when I address incest, I am only taliking about adult with a related adult.
Because I do believe that adults have the freedom to engage in consentual sexual activity, I believe that also would apply to relatives. While the instances of incest amongst adults is rare they would have the right to engage each other in such activity. With that comes the responsibility to raise and care for any childrn which might result from such a union.
I beleiev that this should not be illegal. Please distinguish that from my personal opinion that it is repulsive.