[breakem]

I do not accept your defintion of what is sexual activity and what is not.

Just for fun, let's proceed on your terms. Are you saying that the government can put people in jail for touching other people in a pleasurable manner when they are both adults and they both agree to it. Why would this not be a human right? What would be the source of the power of governmental power to outlaw this behavior.

More to the point, you have a lot of reeducating of people to do, shouldn't you be about your business?

[Clint N. Suhks]

Are you saying that the government can put people in jail for touching other people in a pleasurable manner when they are both adults and they both agree to it.

Yep...that pesky incest law works here even though your "adult" condition is arbitrary and unconstituional.

[eastsider]

Non-coital acts are not identical with coitus. In the land of sex, coitus is king. And I've explained why -- because coitus is ordered toward survival, and non-coital acts are not.

I don't understand the reluctance to support the right to non-coital acts. If there is no support, just say so.