Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
No it's not. I have friends in the medical community who confirmed that Jamie Lee Curtis has 100% female appearance yet is chromosomally a male. She is totally infertile. I presume (don't know) that this also means her body has no uterus and she doesn't ovulate.
38 posted on 05/20/2003 2:50:35 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: tom h
AAAAUUUGGGHGHHHH!!!!!

no way!
40 posted on 05/20/2003 3:00:36 AM PDT by wafflehouse (the hell you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: tom h
Jamie Lee Curtis ... is chromosomally a male. She is totally infertile.
If Jamie Lee Curtis were truly chromosomally a male (XY), she would be presumptively fertile. As I understand it, she is neither chromosomally male nor chromosomally female -- i.e., neither XX nor XY -- but some other combination.
45 posted on 05/20/2003 7:03:51 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson