Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Buys SCO Group's Unix
Internet News ^ | 19 may 2003 | Thor Olavsrud

Posted on 05/19/2003 7:34:48 AM PDT by stainlessbanner

Microsoft threw its weight behind SCO Group's battle against Linux Monday by declaring that it would license Unix technology from SCO in order to "ensure intellectual property compliance across all Microsoft solutions."

Microsoft's license covers a patent and source code from Unix.

SCO claims that the Linux kernel holds Unix intellectual property owned by SCO. The company has moved to hold IBM (Quote, Company Info) responsible, unleashing a $1 billion lawsuit against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets (though not copyright infringement, to date). Still, the company has conceded that some of the alleged Unix code in the Linux kernel predates IBM's involvement with the operating platform, and has warned commercial Linux users that they may be held liable for using it.

While open source legal experts have argued that SCO open sourced that Unix code when it distributed its own version of Linux with the allegedly infringing kernel, that hasn't stopped Microsoft from backing up SCO.

"There are many companies in the IT industry who acknowledge and respect the intellectual property of software," said Chris Sontag, senior vice president and general manager for SCOsource, the company's intellectual property division. "With this announcement, Microsoft is clearly showing the importance of maintaining compatibility with Unix and Microsoft's software solutions through their software licensing. This important step will better help their customers implement Unix and Windows solutions."

It's not the only step the two companies have taken to give Unix and Windows common cause against Linux in the datacenter. SCO also announced Monday that it has worked with Center 7 to create SCO Authentication for Microsoft Active Directory, giving end users the ability to use a single log in for a mixed Windows and Unix environment.

"Many organizations today manage complex network environments running Windows, Unix and other various operating systems," said Opinder Bawa, senior vice president of Engineering and Global Services at SCO. "Authentication within this mix of systems is typically insecure and difficult to manage. SCO Authentication for Microsoft Active Directory allows IT professionals to seamlessly integrate Unix-based system logins with the secure authentication technology they've already paid for in the form of Microsoft Active Directory."

The product users Kerberos security protocols for authentication, and allows administrators to manage either from the Microsoft Management console or the Unix command line. SCO is offering the product in base packs that include 25 directory users starting at $999 for RISC Unix. The company said additional licenses are available for $20 per seat, sold in incremental packs.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: linux; microsoft; sco; techindex; unix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2003 7:34:48 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Is this "The Onion"???
2 posted on 05/19/2003 7:36:40 AM PDT by Mr. K (I'm formidable with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; oc-flyfish; TechJunkYard; TomServo; Dominic Harr; ShadowAce; chance33_98; Bush2000; ...
bump
3 posted on 05/19/2003 7:38:43 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *tech_index
filing
4 posted on 05/19/2003 7:40:21 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Its satire. I don't think Microsoft will be putting out a Linux based version of Windows anytime soon.
5 posted on 05/19/2003 7:42:03 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I think the whole thrust of this article is not that MS wants to put out a Linux version, but that it wants to join forces with "true" Unix in a fight against Linux.

And this, I believe, from MS point of view makes perfect sense.
6 posted on 05/19/2003 7:51:56 AM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Over the years SCO has done so many stupid things it's almost impossible to count all of them. But this one takes the cake. They are so dumb the next thing you will hear is that hired David Boise to represent them. Oh, wait, they DID just hire David Boise. LOL!
7 posted on 05/19/2003 7:53:31 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Tag! You're it. Base is the bumper of my Z06. Catch me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I smell a rat.
8 posted on 05/19/2003 7:53:49 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Microsoft is losing ground to Linux in a small but growing group of previous users. It is fighting aggressively any competition it sees. I hope they are grasping at straws wtih this lawsuit. We need competition in the software environment and Microsoft won't tolerate any competition.
9 posted on 05/19/2003 7:54:03 AM PDT by Dan12180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: stainlessbanner
I guess if you can't beat 'em in the marketplace then try to beat 'em in the courtroom.
11 posted on 05/19/2003 8:17:40 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
"ensure intellectual property compliance across all Microsoft solutions."

Resistance is futile.

12 posted on 05/19/2003 8:20:44 AM PDT by Strider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Alas, tis true.
13 posted on 05/19/2003 8:22:03 AM PDT by chance33_98 (www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
One possible reason for this -- MS has used Unix code in Windows that they didn't have a license to.

First SCO threatens everyone with lawsuits for using their code, then MS suddenly up and licenses it.

Coincidence?

14 posted on 05/19/2003 8:32:55 AM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Sun-Tzu never wrote about the concept of "Embrace, Extend, Destroy," because he never heard of Microsoft.
15 posted on 05/19/2003 8:38:20 AM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
"MS has used Unix code in Windows that they didn't have a license to. "

And what code would that be? Have you seen it?
16 posted on 05/19/2003 8:55:31 AM PDT by PatrioticAmerican (If the 2nd is for hunting, is the 1st only for writing about hunting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
I repeat -- one possible reason for this is . . .
17 posted on 05/19/2003 8:58:00 AM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
It's a kabuki dance - pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

MS already is the second largest shareholder of SCOX. But you don't see the press release mentioning THAT, do you?

18 posted on 05/19/2003 8:59:02 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
And what code would that be? Have you seen it?

Its actually a reasonable conjecture. SCO is maintaining that a great deal of Linux code has been "polluted" by use of unlicensed Unix code contributions that originated with ATT Unix. That's the basis of their suit against IBM, and IBM's contributions to Linux.

Couple that with the fact that its been widely published that MS has incorporated some public domain Linux code, and the conclusion is that maybe some of it was, albeit unintentionally, linked to the ATT code. So, as a humongously deep pocket with a checkered courtroom history, it would be prudent for MS to pony up for a license, just in case.

19 posted on 05/19/2003 9:00:00 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (South-south-west, south, south-east, east....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
MS has used Unix code in Windows that they didn't have a license to

Probably not -- however, Microsoft has certainly used BSD code, which may or may not also be covered by the patent claims that SCO is making about System V. So, part of this may very well be defensive. Of course, the fact that this sets precendent that this is SCO intellectual propery that must be licensed makes it a nice "bank-shot" for them in the SCO vs. Linux lawsuit.

20 posted on 05/19/2003 9:04:06 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson