I've always wondered if those who infer unspoken "issues" in others aren't simply projecting their own.
Take the anti-2A folks, who insist gun owners must have repressed phallic obsessions. Seems to me it's only the grabbers who see a phallus in every gun.
"You must be one of those pre-verts I am always being so supportive of!" Sort of like trying to claim that Joe Hadenuf is an illegal alien, while Sabertooth is a Baathist stooge. How does one counter such idle conjecture and speculation? "No, I'm not!" and then the other side can counter with a "Yes, you are!" and then a "No, I'm not!" followed by a "Yes, you are!" and this passes for debate somehow.
Apparently it's not easy trying to support the advocacy for the protection of perversion and death; the use of ad hominem is much easier for the lazy, calloused, and inured mind.
LOL, Maybe if we make a line of revolvers that look like a....they would.....Ah never mind.....
The "issues" Luis is refering to are FAR FROM "unspoken".
We see these issues posted week after week in repeated and unecessarily graphic discriptions of acts which are "projected" onto these boards...and NOT by Luis.
Everybody I know agrees that the guy who is constantly obsessed with calling people "fags" and "homos" and trying to impress everybody with how much he hates them..and is ALWAYS describing obscene acts, is the one suspected of having real personal issues.
And rightly so.