To: Roscoe
"Legally protected"?
I guess you wish to define "oerversions" for everyone, and they would be anything that someone else does that you don't approve of.
You may approve of pornography, and statistically speaking you probably enjoy pronographic movies or magazines on occassion.
Or your particular perversion is sodomy with your wife or significant other, or maybe even a little bondage, S & M, or even role-playing.
We all have our "perversions" if we are to define sex by strictly Puritan standards, we just don't want other people to have theirs.
243 posted on
05/22/2003 1:50:08 PM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: Luis Gonzalez
anything that someone else does that you don't approve Sodomy equals necktie patterns?
244 posted on
05/22/2003 1:56:22 PM PDT by
Roscoe
To: Luis Gonzalez
We all have our "perversions" if we are to define sex by strictly Puritan standards, we just don't want other people to have theirs. Words mean things. To pervert something means to change it from its original intention.
Homoerotic activity is a perversion because it perverts the intention(s) of sexual behavior. Only if you believe the universe is not designed can you believe that homoerotic acticity is not a perversion. But if you believe that, then no erotic activitiy is a perversion since there is no design.
Don't confuse a person's "perversions" with a person's "preferences." This degeneration of language is dangerous.
Shalom.
253 posted on
05/23/2003 6:08:42 AM PDT by
ArGee
(I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson