Replies

Incest -- Scientific data which offers irrefutable evidence of the near certainty of birth defects, makes that discussion one about the rights of any issue from such a union, specifically in the case of parent/child, or sibling incest. However, incest laws are different from State to State, which will sooner or later be the subject of another case.

Bestiality -- What part of "people" did you not understand?

Pedophilia -- What part of consensual did you not understand? And before you go off, there are "age of consent" laws in every State of the Union, minors can't give their consent, and an adult is not allowed to accept the consent of a minor child.

Necrophilia -- The rights of the deceased are in the hands of the next-of-kin until burial, so if you can get Cousin Billy to say OK to your humping dead Aunt Millie silly, you go boy!!!

Quit it with the absurd boogeymen...no one is buying.

Incest-- Scientific data which offers irrefutable evidence of the near certainty of birth defects…

The CDC says those with genetic defect [spina bifita, cleft palate, downs, club foot…et al] have a whopping 95% rate of passing on their defect, are you going to regulate sexual activity for people with these “genetic” defects or are you just a hypocrite? But…there’s always abortion or how about mom had a hysterectomy or son a vasectomy…it’s OK then right? NO??? Then it must be OK for dad and son or sister and sister since there’s no possibility for procreation. If not you’re just another hypocrite protecting your pet perversion.

Bestiality -- What part of "people" did you not understand?

Absolutely NONE. Animals are property and the only consent needed is from the “people” involved. Or are you for regulating the use of your blow-up doll (i.e. “your property”) too? No??? Then you’re a hypocrite.

Pedophilia -- What part of consensual did you not understand?

Children…some children, have the legal “mental capacity” to consent. An emancipated adult only requires a 70-75 adult IQ for the capacity to provide legal consent, surely you can understand many children have that level of intelligence.

And before you go off, there are "age of consent" laws…

That doesn’t mean a child doesn’t have the mental capacity to consent does it? So if the legislature made the “age of consent” say 10 then it’s OK by you right? If “the law” says it’s OK then it must be the right for everyone.

Yet look at your hypocrisy here again. I thought your threshold for ‘sexual civil rights’ was ONLY based on the capacity to consent and when the legislature says it’s against the law for children that can mentally consent that’s OK but it’s not when it comes to your pet perversion. Why the hypocrisy here?

Necrophilia -- The rights of the deceased are in the hands of the next-of-kin until burial, so if you can get Cousin Billy to say OK to your humping dead Aunt Millie silly, you go boy!!!

So it’s OK for the state to regulate this kind of sexual behavior but not others? You really do pick and choose your hypocrisies don’t you? Wow, how breathtakingly sanctimonious.