Replies

Well, until the secret became impossible to keep the past couple of years, .....

I have heard about them for much longer than that. How did I learn? Is it also possible that the media back then considered it no big deal? It seems that if they don't report it is a conspiracy which includes them, if they do report it, the fact that they hadn't before is also evidence of complicity.

I have expressed my opinion. I see nothing to worry about. However, as I have said before on this matter, if they are powerful enough to control the world there is little you or I can do about it so just hope their interest incorporates ours also.

The majority of Freepers generally have opposed the United Nations. That's the international organization Bill Clinton would like to be general secretary of. Last week World Net Daily carried several leading articles exposing the United Nations, and the current issue of WND's printed Whistleblower magazine is entirely devoted to this major subject.

Therefore one would assume that the majority of Freepers would be strong supporters of World Net Daily, which published this article on the Bilderberg group. How is it, then, that so many posters on this thread have tried to make fun of the Bilderberg article -- or just make light of it?

Can it be that these ridiculing posters are concerned that many Freepers also might join in exposing this secretive cabal, to the point where even the Washington Post, NY Times and the boob tube would have to report Bilderberg doings so the great unwashed would know who were making most important public decisions for them?

And if that were done, does anyone think it would have no effect on selection, and election, of presidential and congressional candidates?