Bilderberg Decides International Affairs

World Net Daily ^ | May 16, 2003 | World Net Daily

[Warhorse]

Above story does not mention that Bill Clinton was an important attendee at the 1991 Bilderberg conference when these powerful people were looking him over to see whether he would be a good U. S. president. They decided "Yes."

[bruinbirdman]

"The venue is Versailles, France."

After reading this article, I am in a quandry. My invitation has Groom Lake as the venue.

There sure are a lot of unkept secrets for a secret organization.

How about this for a secret: yitbos

[Final Authority]

Could Wesley Clark be their next fave?

[Warhorse]

Two other important persons who have been regulars at the Bilderberg conferences are David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. Because this year's conference was in France -- the locations are in different countries in different years -- some had expressed questions on whether Kissinger's personal security could be assured in France because of strong anti-Americanism there.

[strela]

[Fred Mertz]

This is what no one talks about.

[headsonpikes]

I knew it! Those Bilderburgers are just like the others!

They're all b*stards.

[sharktrager]

There is no way a group like this could keep the location secret. Too many high profile people in one place.

[Warhorse]

A lot of the information we have on the Bilderberg conferences has been published, with photographs of some attendees taken from a distance, in major media in different years in such countries as Scotland, Finland, Sweden and elsewhere.

Do you dispute that such conferences have been held?

Do you dispute the fact that the conferees do not regularly disseminate what they talk about? (What we know has mostly come from leaks by inside employees to an enterprising reporter).

Do you dispute the fact that the conferees are important persons who can influence public opinion and public events?

[LiteKeeper]

SITREP

[bruinbirdman]

I do not deny that what Admin edited is a secret.

yitbos

[potlatch]

They've got CANDY KISSES on their heads!! LOL.

[strela]

I thought "Space Age Smurfs" myself, but I like your interpretation better.

[potlatch]

LOL, the minute I looked, it was like giant KISSES - cute!

[potlatch]

I know there has been a lot written here on the forum about Bilderburgh, and some other secret group. I just don't have the energy to go search for it!

[Mind-numbed Robot]

Is Jayson Blair the author of this?

[bruinbirdman]

"I just don't have the energy to go search for it!" Check out this "real" Bilderburger home page. It is not one created by theorists.

Bildergurber Home Page

yitbos

[potlatch]

Thanks, I'll bookmark it! Truth in liberty?

[nutmeg]

read later bump

[Warhorse]

To the best of my recall, the first mention of Bilderberg in a "regular" newspaper in the U. S. was in 1991, when Virginia Gov. Douglas Wilder temporarily lost his discretion and told someone in the press that he had just come home from the Bilderberg conference abroad. That was a "no-no" as far as the conferees were concerned. They were looking over Wilder at the same time they were considering another Democrat, Clinton, who won their approval.

But one of the significant things about the Bilderberg conferences has been that the late Katherine Graham, powerful publisher of the Washington Post, and in recent years her son succeeding her as publisher, have been regular attendees, and yet they have agreed with other conferees not to publish anything in the Post about the conference. Formerly it was the custom of many to deny that the Bilderberg even existed.

But I suppose this has nothing to do with secrecy, in the view of some of the termite posters.