Replies

This Homeland Security agenda is an "Ace of Spades" for these lying low life liberals.

Let's not forget where the "CONCEPT" of this agency started.

In the study done by HART/RUDMAN regarding terrorism/security release prior to 9/11, where warnings and vulnerabilities of national security were looked at and recommendations were given to increase national security.

I have read and heard on the tube that Newt came up with the idea of HOMELAND SECURITY AGENCY. President Bush initially rejected the idea and then the lying low life liberals took hold of it, pushing it with the demand of "special status for unions".

President Bush rejected giving "special status for unions" and traveled the country speaking about needing a Homeland Security Agency without "special status for unions" and won back the Senate with those speeches.

This was a peeling away of the lying low life liberal power and they set about using Homeland Security Agency as pay back. Right in the middle of Lott's babbeling prior to him stepping down there was a "LIBERAL" (I don't remember who he or they were) on Fox news, I think on a Monday morning when everyone else was talking LOTT, that said the liberals would be using Homeland Security Funding against President Bush.

Since January 2003, one of Hillary's shrills, in her dragon voice has been about Homeland Security Funding.

What did in fact happen with Congress appropriating funds for the Homeland Security Agency, which the President publicly complained about, was the funding was being sent directly out to individual groups firefighters/police UNIONS, by individual Senators/ Hillary bragged about sending money for gas masks to someone in New York City.

Congress, (who knows what the Republicans were doing when they allowed this to happen) itself did not fund this Homeland Security Agency at the top thereby taking the President or Tom Ridge ability to get money to "first responders" nation wide.

The dirty little secret of these lying low life liberals is that for their plan to make maximun affect they really need another terrorist attack to give their lies credibility, that President Bush has not funded Homeland Security and therefore not really concerned about terrorism at home.

Hillary and bj are still seething that President Bush took out Saddam because it was so displeasing to their fellow travelers of the world under the UN, Russia, France and Germany. Reason that bjclinton kept telling us that we should "follow Blix" and that all N. Korea wanted was "RESPECT".

Don't forget one of the most insane speeches given was by "Tiny Tom" to a group of state, local, and country convention "UNION" itching about funding under the HOMELAND Security Agency.