To: OldFriend
Yep. Taint the jury pool and sway public opinion to the favor of his client.
I don't think it's gonna work.
I think MG was using Geraldo to put out the defense spin, knowing that the report was going to be sealed before the prosecution could publicly respond.
47 posted on
05/17/2003 8:43:23 AM PDT by
EllaMinnow
("We won't gloat. We don't need to. It's enough just to watch them sulk.")
To: redlipstick
Geraldo is part of the defense team. I fail to see why FNC allows this. But then, there's lots to be disappointed about on FNC lately. And that includes O'R's rants and irrational raving about various topics.
51 posted on
05/17/2003 9:10:04 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: redlipstick
On who's authority are public records being "sealed"?
It is OUR courthouse and OUR policeforce and OUR prosecutors and OUR public record and we want to see EVERYTHING and I did not authorize any private lawyer to seal or conceal anything.
58 posted on
05/17/2003 11:16:42 AM PDT by
Publicus
(Come November, We'll Remember)
To: redlipstick
Yep. Taint the jury pool and sway public opinion to the favor of his client. I don't think it's gonna work. Why not? It worked for the Prosecution in the Westerfield case.
74 posted on
05/28/2003 1:37:26 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson