Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonny M
its just more expensive, and not efficient.
Yes this is why I call it junk science
9 posted on 05/16/2003 11:35:23 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (CCCP = clinton, chiraq, chretien, and putin = stalin wannabes (moore is goebbels))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran; Sonny M
junk science should be used to define things junk like magnets curing back aches. This is not junk science since the science part of it does work. It will produce "oil" in the quantities talked about. Will it make a profit? That is up to the free market and govt regulations.
10 posted on 05/16/2003 11:56:21 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
It seems to me, that getting rid of millions of tons of waste is worth the cost / benefit ratio.

Just getting rid of millions (billions?) of old tires would clean up the environment, and provide energy and recycled materials.

It's not like we have to depend on this process exclusively, but when used in a judicious manner, to solve problems concerning waste disposal, this method is preferable to shipping waste to some third world country.

12 posted on 05/17/2003 1:21:36 AM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson