If you want on or off this list, just let me know.
TNC is nothing but an abusive socialist real estate investment conglonmerate, I hope to God that you take the largest chunk possible out of their ass. I'm imagining that as we speak you're finding out exactly the monster they are.
Yeah baby.
Mark Levin of Landmark Legal is a FReeper, this is great news for people on our side. It's about time someone went after TNC.
MEGA MARK BUMP!
Give the enviro-fascists holy hell!
Every so often we see eco-terrorist attacks on property, like the torching near Aspen. I suspect that none of these Nature Conservancy backers and officials have had their opulent properties attacked by eco-terrorists!
There was a 3 day series in the Washington Post earlier this month, exposing them. Here are some links from Ethan_Allan's post on them:
TODAY'S ARTICLE - HOW A BID TO SAVE A SPECIES CAME TO GRIEF
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13933-2003May4.html
Cover page for all articles is here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/specials/natureconservancy/
BIG GREEN : Inside the Nature Conservancy Nonprofit Land Bank Amasses Billions (thread)
The Senate Finance Committee's chairman, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and the ranking Democrat, Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, are drafting a letter to the Conservancy seeking answers to a range of concerns about the land deals."Taxpayers have the right to know how The Nature Conservancy conducts its business," Grassley said in a statement May 9 to the Washington Post. "I'll be overseeing the charity's actions, asking tough questions and following through until satisfactory answers are given."
Some of the prominent families that have given to the Maine chapter include Richard G. Rockefeller of Falmouth, son of David Rockefeller Sr. of New York; and Leon and Lisa Gorman of Yarmouth.
(snip)
Why is it that Biosphere Reserves, World Heritage Sites, Sustainable Development Programs, The Wildlands Project, and Convention on Biological Diversity all call for greenways, protected areas, wilderness reserves and natural corridors surrounded by regulated "buffer zones"? And why do federal agencies, the Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, and other environmental groups strongly promote the same "sustainable" development agenda?
It is no coincidence. All of these programs, treaties, and organizations have one thing in common; the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Through the IUCN, government agencies such as the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the US Forest Service, the EPA and other federal agencies can huddle in private with the Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy, National Wildlife Federation, National Audubon Society, Society of Conservation Biology, UNEP, UNDP, UNESCO and many others to develop strategies to implement their "ecospiritual" agenda on the ground by changing US policy -- without any knowledge of Congress or the people who will be affected.
Making US policy is constitutionally the exclusive right of Congress, by the consent of the people, and not federal bureaucrats. Nonetheless, an August, 1993 EPA Internal Working Document states, "Natural resource and environmental agencies... should...develop a joint strategy to help the United States fulfill its existing international obligations (e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Agenda 21).... The executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies...in light of international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international objectives." (Bold and italics added)