NOW gang meeting near DC, July 11 - 13, ALL Dem. Presidential Candidates invited to speak

NOW website conference info ^

[maeng]

If anyone ever needed proof that the Democratic party has been taken over by NOW, here it is!!

[goldstategop]

We'll hear Kim Gandy invite them to say how "pro-choice" they are. A "pro-life" life Democrat (at least one running as a presidential candidate) these days is an oxymoron.

[boomop1]

NOW has about a .05% or less membership of the women of America yet the biggest mouth, this will be an abortion seminar, and all the losers will fall in step.

[tractorman]

A suck-up fest to see who's partial to partially supporting partial birth abortion.
All for the children, don't you know.

[lady lawyer]

I read a few years ago that the majority of the members of NOW are lesbians. They have nothing to say to the majority of women in this country, who want a normal family life.

[maeng]

Abortion and homosexual seminar! Don't forget, most of the NOW women are lesbian...

[maeng]

We have got to expose these "pro-death" people every time we can!

[Izzy Dunne]

I think they'll be promoting the new Sweetwater Post-Natal Abortion Clinics, myself.

[Blue Screen of Death]

NOW has about a .05% or less membership of the women of America yet the biggest mouth, this will be an abortion seminar, and all the losers will fall in step.

Why would lesbians care, one way or the other, about abortion?

[plain talk]

How can this be? NOW is supposedly "non-partisan", right? I'm shocked and outraged.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Isn't it vice versa?

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Could this be another job for...Viking Kitty?

[Eternal_Bear]

demo candidates with any real cajones need not apply!

[condolinda]

Why would lesbians care, one way or the other, about abortion?

Abortion destroys the fruit of heterosexual relationships. Then the women can be as "barren" as they are. Abortion also is said to be entirely a "woman's right to choose", many times cutting out any input from the male partner, further weakening heterosexual relationships.

[Libloather]

Will this be on C-Span? Must-see TV.

Can't wait for the official NAG opinion on the Kennedy mess - one free teenage concubine?

[sauropod]

Think I'll be there with a sign that sez: "Hold your nose and vote for Al!"

[Flora McDonald]

Speaking of holding your nose...
From the Workshop page of NOW's website:
http://www.now.org/organization/conference/2003/workshops.html

"Please note that in consideration of those with allergies and respiratory problems, the 2003 National NOW Conference is a scent-free event. Participants are asked to use unscented products in lieu of scented toiletries and detergents, and to refrain from wearing perfumes and colognes."

LOL...these guys are hilarious! oops - make that gals.

[ladyinred]

Hmmm, no Pubbies invited? Gee, I thought that NOW stood for national org of women. There are women who are Pubbies, and independants, and gulp, other. One would think they would be fair and balanced wouldn't one? (gag) They don't represent me. I think they will endorse the guy who can actually perform an abortion with this own two hands live on stage.

[MHGinTN]

The exercise is to dehumanize the individual at the earliest possible age along the continuum that is an individual lifetime. NOW's agenda isn't so much about abortion defense as it is about defending the total dehumanization of the unborn ... the unborn must never again be allowed to be perceived by society as human beings worthy of LIFE, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness because as soon as the unborn are perceived to be human beings, the ghoulish reality of the abortion defenders is exposed ... making them ghouls by definition! By dehumanizing the unborn, the NOW freaks hope to redefine humanity as they perceive the race. Need we speak of how they define the race?