Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sharktrager
Look at the bind Israel is in:
It can either respond by giving into demands, thus making terrorism profitable, or by destroying it.

The problem is that the media is complicit with the terrorists victimization strategy both by playing up the trauma of attacks and by playing up responses.

5 posted on 05/15/2003 6:34:23 PM PDT by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rmlew
I like Rumsfeld's response: go massive, sweep it all up. I completely disagree that we can maintain our liberal values (classic sense of the word: open, humanitarian, moral) in responding to terror. That's the first thing that has to go, at least in how we treat our enemies. The fire and nuclear bombings of cities in WWII were not "moral" and "liberal" acts. Once the Axis started putting people in ovens, there could be no holding back. To be moral in our response would have in itself been immoral.

It's a weak lie to say that we must hold back today.
6 posted on 09/17/2003 2:46:51 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson