[fqued]

By the way, Lorianne, you don't answer direct questions put to you, so maybe some posters have no choice but to try to put some order into your statements.

I have waited for your answer to someone else's post #994. That person asked a quite appropriate and apropos question. You failed to answer it.

I also posted a general question in my post #995, which you also ignored.

Admittedly, you can answer or not, you are under no obligation (ha ha) to do so, but your failure to answer post #994 does not rise to level of fairness.

[Lorianne]

The question in #994 was whether I take marriage vows seriously or not. I do. (Incidently, I don't a promise to have sex in the marriage vows. I know it is generally implied with marriage, but if you're taking the vows literally, sex isn't mentioned).

Do the people who imply that if one spouse isn't getting sex that is grounds for divorce, or to threaten infidelity taking their vows seriously?

Also, the writer never answered my question as to why a spouse would want sex on an obligation basis. Plus the writer was rude and inventing things about my personal life, so I did not reply to him.

The specific question in #995 I couldn't glean.