To: Amelia
Bush seems to be spot on with this one. This is a reasonable restriction. We can be proud that he is on our side when it comes to supporting the extension of this law.
249 posted on
05/14/2003 8:12:15 PM PDT by
FSPress
To: FSPress
You gots to be jiving me man.
To: FSPress
Reasonable restriction? Thanks for the laugh.
257 posted on
05/14/2003 8:14:35 PM PDT by
Sir Gawain
(Kil-lin' is my bid-ness, lay dees. And bid-ness is goooood.)
To: FSPress
Bush seems to be spot on with this one. This is a reasonable restriction. We can be proud that he is on our side when it comes to supporting the extension of this law. Did you put your flame suit on before you typed that?
It doesn't matter; the Democrats are crying because the extension doesn't seem likely to pass, even though the President says he supports it.
262 posted on
05/14/2003 8:16:15 PM PDT by
Amelia
(#8!)
To: FSPress
This is a reasonable restriction So you think the AG can ban any gun he wants to because it's not considered adequate for "sporting purposes".
Cause guess what, that's in the new bill.
263 posted on
05/14/2003 8:16:39 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("You are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute." - Demolition Man)
To: FSPress
Bush seems to be spot on with this one. This is a reasonable restriction.I know you are being sarcastic, but I haven't seen any posters on this thread who think that AWB "is a reasonable restriction".
That makes your "sarcastic remark", not very ironic.
297 posted on
05/14/2003 8:32:45 PM PDT by
FreeReign
(V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson