Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/14/2003 8:56:59 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
National Post rules!
2 posted on 05/14/2003 8:57:46 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Schadenfreude ping!
3 posted on 05/14/2003 9:01:52 AM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
The events set in motion by Jayson Blair make the Times sound wildly out of control.

The events indicate that, while the NYT makes its money by selling news, its primary focus is not the news.

4 posted on 05/14/2003 9:03:28 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Ward Connerly was right. Ultimately affirmative action cheats legitimately talented and successful minorities because it calls into question the legitimacy of their achievements. This is profoundly corrosive and profoundly unfair. And it is precisely why the con artists and race hucksters hate Connerly so much.
9 posted on 05/14/2003 9:14:16 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Is this code for "being be branded a racist if he requires high standards for all reporters regardless of skin color?"

I've heard of "groupthink" but this is nuts.

Here the Times account becomes peculiarly obscure, perhaps betraying anxiety. It quotes Landman saying that the publisher and the executive editor "had made clear the company's commitment to diversity."

12 posted on 05/14/2003 9:26:26 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Unfortunately, there are times when that honesty suddenly disappears

The writer is off track here. The continuing problems with Blair hardly merit the label "sudden".

14 posted on 05/14/2003 9:33:03 AM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
But, as Shafer concludes, "All that said, it's almost impossible for an editor to beat a good liar every time out."

That explains a lot about the Times attitude towards the Clintons.

20 posted on 05/14/2003 11:01:51 AM PDT by theDentist (So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Robert Fulford bump.

It seems like the old coot's just warming up!

I hope he writes for many years.
24 posted on 05/14/2003 12:41:47 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Yawn.

NYT lost credibility with me 30 years ago. Who didn't know they were a bunch of Liberal panyy weight Liars?

No NEWS here.

Move on.

26 posted on 05/14/2003 1:13:33 PM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
The New York Times is now Number 1 on the New York Times' Best-Selling Fiction List.
28 posted on 05/14/2003 1:28:04 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson