Skip to comments.
2 More NYT Reporters Being Investigated for Journalistic Irregularities
DrudgeReport ^
| May 13, 2003
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 05/14/2003 5:02:37 AM PDT by ewing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: ewing
I'm still waiting for a former white NYT reporter who was canned for far less than what was tolerated from Blair to file a reverse discrimination lawsuit.
41
posted on
05/14/2003 6:43:44 AM PDT
by
randita
To: randita
Ref post 41....That would be very interesting to say the least.
To: ewing
After eight years of Liberal leadership that lied, hustled and broke a ton of laws that incovenienced their agenda...is anyone shocked to see this.
We learn that the whole time...
The stock market crashes because of accountants with fuzzy math. The FBI & CIA miss a 9/11 plot that a child could've contemplated [and probably prevented]. Reporters making up stories wholesale [any of those stories slant right?].
We had a saying in the Marine Corps: **** rolls downhill.
If the executive leadership of a nation is so overwhelmingly corrupt...it is a spiritual law that eventually the whole of society will become infected with the same corruption.
I dont care what your philosophy...anyone who votes for a Liberal is a traitor.
How do you like that prism.
43
posted on
05/14/2003 7:44:48 AM PDT
by
VaBthang4
(Could someone show me one [1] Loserdopian elected to the federal government?)
To: mewzilla
perhaps some photographers would like to go down to where they are having their meeting this afternoon. I bet they would be real happy to have their pictures taken going in there. Maybe some Freepers could be there to greet them and let them know everyone knows what their meeting is going to be about. Ask em afterwards how many heads were rollin in there or something...
To: George W. Bush
It is hard to tell what is going on over in the executive bedrooms where the NY Slimes is managed.
The NY Slimes had been lying for over 70 years and getting by with it.
Now with the internet, Fox News, conservative talk radio, the NY Post and Washington Times, they can't get by with it.
As soon as they lie, spin, use half truths, the old unidentified source and other shams in a story, it is all over the internet and the conservative news sources.
I doubt if the Slimes will bring honest reporting and show both sides of the political story. The key owners of the Slimes drive and control the Rats. They can make any rat politician or break them. They like the key owners of ABCNNBCBS are life long elite left wingers, and they are too arrogant to change. This arrogance will eventually weaken their hold and stature in America. That process has started since the November 2000 election.
To: Diogenesis
Ann Coulter must be loving this. Sweet vindication.
46
posted on
05/14/2003 8:13:36 AM PDT
by
cgk
(Liberal truisms are the useless children of hindsight.)
To: ewing
'Journalistic irregularities'?????
Could that mean lying, fabrication, and obfuscation???
47
posted on
05/14/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: ewing
My favorite reply to a liberal whom is surprised by a fact is; "Of course you didn't know it honey, you read the New York Times."
To: ewing
49
posted on
05/14/2003 8:23:14 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: Siouxz
Can you say "tip of the iceburg?" I get the feeling the NY Times is riding in the North Atlantic, and I keep hearing a voice that says:
"Jack! JAACCK! I love you Jaaaacck!"
50
posted on
05/14/2003 8:42:08 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
(CNN- the "Al Jazeera" of the West)
To: Colofornian
The NY Times held a special forum for its employees on the Blair matter.Yeah, I hear they're serving scotch, cheeze doodles, and smokes during the event.
51
posted on
05/14/2003 8:43:43 AM PDT
by
randog
(It's always darkest before the dawn--a good time to steal the neighbor's newspaper...)
To: ewing
Does this mean photographers will set their cameras to a slower shutter speed, or just under-develop their photos?
52
posted on
05/14/2003 8:49:29 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
To: ewing
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
To: aristeides
Rosenthal: more integrity in his little finger than the whole New York Times staff put together. Time to clean house?
55
posted on
05/14/2003 9:36:10 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: ewing
I think all paid journalists should be registered and required to take classes.
There should be a 5-day waiting period for any new word processor software purchases - except at computer shows, of course!
Surely the First Amendment allows for "reasonable" regulations?
56
posted on
05/14/2003 10:02:21 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Ghengis
lol, Think of the female children who cannot grow up to become member at AugustaNational!
57
posted on
05/14/2003 10:28:34 AM PDT
by
ewing
To: ewing
More Fraud at the New York Times.
The New York Times and the White House website ^ | 5-14-03
Posted on 05/14/2003 11:09 AM PDT by TomB
As if the Times doesn't have enough trouble right about now, their resident grouchy spinster, Maureen Dowd, has pulled a "jayson". For all of you who don't know what that is, it is the newspeak for willfully making up facts to fit a news story. Apparently the elderly Ms. Dowd is not happy with all the attention the higher-ups at the Times have been lavishing on their former employee, and current disgrace, Jayson Blair.
So, in a last-ditch attempt to get her name back in the limelight, Mo has done some of her own quote-doctoring. Here is a few lines from her latest screed:
Busy chasing off Saddam, the president and vice president had told us that Al Qaeda was spent. "Al Qaeda is on the run," President Bush said last week. "That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. . . . They're not a problem anymore."
Well, that sounds like a pretty stupid thing for the President to say. So, looking it up on the White House website, we find the actual quote
"Al Qaeda is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly, but surely being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top al Qaeda operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem anymore. (Applause.) And we'll stay on the hunt. To make sure America is a secure country, the al Qaeda terrorists have got to understand it doesn't matter how long it's going to take, they will be brought to justice. (Applause.)"
Well, quite a difference, no?
To: Siouxz
"tip of the iceberg"
59
posted on
05/14/2003 8:04:15 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson