To: 11B3
No, I merely agreeing with the Pastor that Bush is doing what the Rats do and you supporting him is supporting what the Rats do. Bush has already made it clear he is going to continue the ban on "assault weapons" and everything else he said was true.
To: Republican_Strategist
13 posted on
05/14/2003 12:03:12 AM PDT by
Mo1
(I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
To: Republican_Strategist
Republican_Strategist - How the get 1% of the American Vote - listen to me :)
26 posted on
05/14/2003 12:07:25 AM PDT by
america-rules
(I'm one proud American right now !)
To: Republican_Strategist
The supposed support by the President is merely posturing in order to draw the Dims out into full view. They are already obliging him by putting together a totally unacceptable bill - for anyone but Stalin. This legislation will never get out of committee - much less off of the House floor - and the President knows this. By drawing out the Dims, the public gets another look at how extreme the Rats really are shortly before election time. This is a good thing. By taking the Rats propaganda at face value (hook, line and sinker), you are underestimating the President just as his enemies do. If the shoe fits, then wear it.
"Strategery" strikes again. Just like so many times already, the President is light years ahead of anyone who plays chess only one or two moves at a time. Stop being so simple, and think ahead. The whining, complaining, and doubting before the game even starts is a liberal trait. Your handle is ill-fitting.
30 posted on
05/14/2003 12:08:49 AM PDT by
11B3
(Happiness IS a warm gun. After a long day's use on the liberal masses.)
To: Republican_Strategist
No, I merely agreeing with the Pastor that Bush is doing what the Rats do and you supporting him is supporting what the Rats do. Bush has already made it clear he is going to continue the ban on "assault weapons" and everything else he said was true.And the beat go on...mfn for Red China, "national monuments" that tie up low sulfur coal, deny the "peoples" wilderness to the people, the trashing of the 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments, obeiasance to the envio-freaks, and the beat goes on and on and ...
122 posted on
05/14/2003 1:00:36 AM PDT by
rightofrush
(Not only Rush, but Buchanan as well.)
To: Republican_Strategist
George W. is just another big government man.
Personally, I want much smaller government, so he's not MY man.
To: Republican_Strategist
For crying out loud! I'm upset with a lot that Bush has done, but no sane individual can claim that we're not infinitely better off with him at the helm rather than Algore. I shudder to think what life would be like with Algore or The 'Toon in power right now. Choose to see the glass as half full rather than half empty.
To: Republican_Strategist
this place is full of kool aid drinking hypocrites, if you havent noticed. It is better to vote for a liberal, and here is why:
With a pubbie congress, if algore had tried to pass any of this statist crap, the pubbies would have blocked it, or at least tried to. The way it is now, they just let it slide, cause gw is one of their tribe.
202 posted on
05/14/2003 6:15:26 AM PDT by
galt-jw
To: Republican_Strategist
So you would rather have one of the democratic candidates in office???
To: Republican_Strategist
Bush has already made it clear he is going to continue the ban on "assault weapons" That statement in and of itself, speaks ill of your ability to grasp Strategy, Strategist.
Common sense, tells anyone that is paying attention, that he knows that DeLay, will not let the Ban get out of the house, So the Right is protected, while he dances to the middle. And that Leaves whoever runs against him in 04, without one of the Rats signature issues.
281 posted on
05/14/2003 9:03:07 AM PDT by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: Republican_Strategist
"No, I merely agreeing with the Pastor that Bush is doing what the Rats do and you supporting him is supporting what the Rats do." I wonder how many folks who voted for Bush in 00 will be voting for Lieberman in 04. The RATS hate Lieberman, so who are they going to vote for besides Bush? They're not going to vote for Gephardt, Dean, Edwards, Sharpton, Kerry, etc. Only a select number of RATS (maybe 5 to 8%) will vote for someone who they know can't capture a majority.
To: Republican_Strategist
Sure Bush has made blunder (IMHO) and mistakes. But for the reverend pastor to equate him with Clinton (who couldn't go a week without some major scandal erupting) is way, way over the top.
To: Republican_Strategist
Thanks for posting this, don't let the Bushbots get you down. They seem to have forgetton about a right and wrong once Bush was elected. I guess holding someone accountable is no longer applicable.
To: Republican_Strategist
These political purists make me crazy. If you agree with them 95 % of the time, the only thing they can think of is that 5% of disagreement, and they want to write you off.
What morons, If they can't get a whole loaf, they'd prefer the nation go straight to hell. .......and be quick about it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson