[KDD]

Let us know if you get a reply.

[SteveH]

Assault weapon ban sunset *bang

[Aric2000]

Excellent, I just hope that the president gets a chance to read it.

I seriously doubt that the guys that run the website would take a 2nd amendment letter very seriously, probably half if not more are from the Clinton administration.

I do hope it gets to him somehow though.

[Redbob]

"Assault weapons"?

Let's all start calling them what they really are:

Homeland Defense Weapons!

[elbucko]

Besides, "assault" weapons is a redundant term.

"Assault Weapon" is just a PC term to imply a danger that does not exist.

[Redbob]

BTW, e-mailing ANYone is just too easy to do, and is too easy to ignore.

Call the White House Comment Line, (202) 456-1111
don't press 1 - wait for a live operator.
Tie the lines up!

[Richard-SIA]

Actually, it is a politically inspired pejoritive term with no basis in reality, a legal fiction of the liberal socialist, designed to create a false sense of dread in the mind of anyone hearing it.
It is cynically crafted to deprive law abideing Americans of their second amendmant rights, an open ended attack as more arms are added by redefining a term that is pure fraud to begin with!

"Semi-automatic assault weapon" is nonsense, it is self contradictory, akin to a "Genuine simulation", or an "Authentic reproduction".

"Semi-Automatic" = One shot per pull of the trigger.
The GENUINE definition of an "Assault weapon" is a SELECTIVE FIRE (capable of fully automatic fireing) weapon of intermediate caliber.

The current "AW Ban" covers guns of every caliber and gauge, from .22 to .50BMG.

Properly, pistol caliber "AW's" would be Submachine guns, firearms using intermediate caliber rounds would be Assault Rifles, full power weapons would be Battle rifles, or light and heavy machine guns.

All machine guns in the U.S. have been unconstitutionally "controlled", registered, and subject to a punitive $200 transfer tax since 1934.

The AW Ban is a blight on our countries landscape, an embarassment left over from the Klinton regime, and overdue to be removed.
Unconstitutional law is farce, is has no legitimacy.
Thus Bush must work for it's elimination if he is truly committed to "bringing honesty and integrity" back to the White House!
He can do so without betraying his campaign pledge to "support all existing laws", he need only comprehend that "unconstitutional" = VOID!

[BlueDragon]

Here, let me demonstrate how my pet rock can assume the
attack/assault position---
Stands with left arm extended forward, right hand (holding rock) cocked back over shoulder---ready to assault!
They can have my rock when they pry my cold...

[Jesse]

Well, I wrote too, but signing unconstitutional legislation is not a problem with Bush. He prefers to let other people handle the heavy work and take the political risks instead of using his veto power and doing the job he was elected to do...for instance, like the courts have had to do with campaign finance reform.

Isn't Bush a member of the Republican Party, which is constantly complaining that the courts are making laws instead of just interpreting the laws?

Like we ask the gun grabbers "Just what part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?", just what part of "I do solemnly swear...I will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." don't you understand, Mr. Bush?