Skip to comments.
Suit Seeks to Ban Kids From Eating Oreos (absolutely frivolous lawsuit alert)
Yahoo! News ^
| May 12, 2003
| AP
Posted on 05/12/2003 10:38:12 PM PDT by El Conservador
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Can you find a more irrelevant lawsuit than this???
To: El Conservador
Informed consent is such a slight, unimportant thing? I think it's a hallmark of a free society.
To: El Conservador; All
The main problem is - this guy has brought this suit in one of the most LIBERAL court systems in the country. These people legislate from the bench and love to punish corporate dollars.
And ... this is another "I told you so" from Rush!!
3
posted on
05/12/2003 10:51:23 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: El Conservador
Can we get the email address for this jerk, so we can ask him to sue God on our behalf, because we All have to die someday, and that gross injustice inhibits our right to '(Enternal, according to these clowns) Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness'? Why stop at Oreos??? Sue against DEATH itself!
Give me a break. When will we be free of over-educated Mary Poppins like this????
To: OldFashionedAmerican
How about the famous McDonalds coffee scalding case? Opinions?
To: Cultural Jihad
How about the famous McDonalds coffee scalding case? Opinions?To be honest with you, I'm not sure which case is more pathetic. Probably this one, on further review. After all, the McDonalds coffee case didn't actually ask to ban coffee sales, while this grandiose scheme seems, to me at least, to aim to deny Oreos to us all! We might as well outlaw Oxygen..... I think I read somewhere that it is technically a corrosive element.
To: Cultural Jihad
Partially hydrogenated vegetable oils may well be dangerous to one's health. Unlike the many other food nazi claims running around about Alar and the like.
I tried to avoid MSG and hydrogenated foods for years now.
Both are also known to be neuro toxins.
I think the public is very uninformed on this issue. Oreo's are pretty light in the hydrogenated oil department compared to other foods though.
I'll put my flame suit on now...
7
posted on
05/12/2003 11:23:04 PM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: El Conservador
Stephen Joseph said he filed the suit against Nabisco, the maker of Oreos, after reading articles that said the artificial fat is hidden in most packaged food, though consumers have no way of knowing.Wrong again, oh mighty consumer crusader! What decent parent does not know instinctively that a diet too 'heavy' in cookies can not be a good thing????
To: El Conservador
Saw the guy on the news tonight. Looks like he's had a few Oreos himself.
9
posted on
05/12/2003 11:26:06 PM PDT
by
Wacka
To: All
To this guy, the only appropriate words that apply are - "Get A Life, why don't you?"
To: El Conservador
We were just discussing tonight how I haven't had an Oreo cookie in about 20 years......well....it's time....with a nice cup of coffee...mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
11
posted on
05/12/2003 11:35:31 PM PDT
by
geege
To: OldFashionedAmerican
I heard a report on the local radio today about gel-based candies. Apparently, while people can and do choke to death on steak and apples, there is an inherent knowledge that such foods can be dangerous if improperly ingested or chewed. But there's a type of suit based on unknowledgable hazards. A person expects that candies will dissolve in saliva, but when a manufacturer makes and markets a candy which is a choking hazard, it becomes a litigation issue. The person being interviewed (I forget which lawyers' group he represented) explained the significance of the McDonalds coffee lawsuit. The corporation was aware of the danger of scalding, but callously decided that the costs of repairing the coffee urns would be greater than the litigation costs from scalded customers; the woman in particular who was scalded required skin grafting.
To: Cultural Jihad
I argue that even semi-intelligent people understand that too many cookies are not good for a person, even if they do not know every chemical reason why. Oreos have been around for a long time, and our average life span continues to go up. What kind of a danger do they really pose???
To: OldFashionedAmerican
Have Oreos always contained artificial fat?
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: El Conservador
From my cold dead hands!!!!!!!!!!! Not my cookies.
16
posted on
05/12/2003 11:46:02 PM PDT
by
noutopia
To: All
I think it would be nothing short of miraculous if the banning of Oreos was statistically proven to increase the life span of the average American.
To: Constructionist
You should replace the word 'Zionist' with 'Socialist' and you would be right.
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Cultural Jihad
Have Oreos always contained artificial fat?Honestly, I don't know. But how much could they have changed over the years?? I've had some within the last six months, I am over 50 years old, and they do not taste one iota different to me than they did 30 years ago.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson