[brownie]

I think Torie is correct. People who support abortion on demand and marketing in human parts (what is called cannabilism on this thread) are people who have already decided (as a matter of faith in liberal ideology) that human life does not begin until the child is separated from the mother and the first breath is drawn.

They must defend this tenet of their liberal faith at all costs, otherwise, they have to admit that what they support is killing for the sake of expedience.

Thus, people who have this liberal faith will never be persuaded by arguments, as they will always believe anything other than a child that is "born" and "breathing" are human.

On the other hand, the vast majority of americans do not have a belief on this already, and can be persuaded through logical argument, such as the article above.

[MHGinTN]

Thank you! That was the author's intention, to address the issues to the vast majority of fellow Americans who are moderate and likely uninformed but willing to look into it before having legislation passed by their elected representatives that would offend their value system. Many do not consider utilitarian cannibalism a bad thing and will embrace it willingly if said cannibalism can make Mister Reeve walk again or cure their parent's Parkinsons. Because of that dichotomy, it is important that these issues be discussed.