Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
You are making the error of equating blood (a subunit of the organism) with the whole organism (as in an embryo is the organism, the whole person at the age of embryo).

... and(in vitro fertilization) the process redefined the earliest age of an individual’s lifetime as but one stage ‘in a process that eventually becomes a human being’. (That new definition arbitrarily chosen claimed the 'thing' eventually becomes a human being, but the prior truth had to be ignored in order to establish the new utilitarian definition.) The individual life begins at conception. The 'clock' of lifetime begins ticking at conception and each age of the individual is but an age along a continuum that is an individual's lifetime.

119 posted on 05/13/2003 7:24:03 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
You are making the error of equating blood (a subunit of the organism) with the whole organism (as in an embryo is the organism, the whole person at the age of embryo).

Then what's your problem with stem cells? Cells are just part of that glob of cells you call a human being at two weeks. Are you saying that taking a cell or two is equivalent to canibalism but that taking a pint of blood isnt?

122 posted on 05/13/2003 7:53:20 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson