Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillF
“Defender of Milosovich,”

What's wrong with that? Milosevich is being tried by the NWOrld Court. However, if Clark is just defending Milosevich's actions in general, that's another story, I presume?

28 posted on 05/12/2003 6:59:15 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (You believe that happy crappy? Don't tell me; I'll tell you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
What's wrong with that? Milosevich is being tried by the NWOrld Court. However, if Clark is just defending Milosevich's actions in general, that's another story, I presume?

Funny you should ask.

I mentioned to Angelwood and Kristinn today that I didn't fault Clark for defending Milosevich in court. However, Clark does indeed defend him in a political sense (i.e., apart from a legal action).

Clark is not like a lawyer who is just an attorney representing a mobster in a particular case (acceptable). Clark is more like a lawyer who becomes a consigliere (sp?), facilitating criminal activities by the mob that he works for (not acceptable). Clark is "mobbed up" to every anti-U.S. dictator on the planet.

39 posted on 05/12/2003 7:50:17 PM PDT by BillF (Sorry anti-America leftists, Saddam has left the planet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson