Replies

This document from your references (For 1973 (?) - and why is it relevent at all in your crusade I don't know ?) has the "NO" used properly as a "header" to the "9" for April 73 duty days.

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc17.gif

Again: Show me some documents that indicate Bush missed training days in the period Oct and Nov of 1972. These all show he was working in 1973 ...

You have shown me nothing to back up your claims.

---...---

I don't believe ANY national democrat politician - regardless of whether they are under oath or not, after they claim ignorance or "I don't remember" several thousand times infornt of Congress while trying to investigate Clinton's bribes and treasonous sale of military/commercial secrets to China.

Are you going to claim "Barnes" statement is somehow relevent and "truthful" without any backup or evidence that it was actually somehow "evil" or "reprehensible", while claiming Bush is flat out lying when he says he (Bush) was on active duty in Alabama?

Asking for an appointment in the ANG ISN'T illegal, by the way.

Taking millions in foreign money is illegal.

This document from your references (For 1973 (?) - and why is it relevent at all in your crusade I don't know ?) has the "NO" used properly as a "header" to the "9" for April 73 duty days.

Thanks for the link and finally we can agree on something. I think I ignored that document because it didn't seem relevant to what you're calling my "crusade." If any article used that document to make their case, then you can dismiss it. Most articles, however, didn't.

You have shown me nothing to back up your claims.

In my #209, I give you the sequence of documents as I see it. They do show Bush wasn't in TX from May 1972-April 1973. There are no document to show that he did his time in AL. You can't back up your claims either.

Are you going to claim "Barnes" statement is somehow relevent and "truthful" without any backup or evidence that it was actually somehow "evil" or "reprehensible", while claiming Bush is flat out lying when he says he (Bush) was on active duty in Alabama?

I'm saying that it was in Barnes' interest to tell the truth on the matter, and Bush's interest to lie. Who said "evil"? I am tempted by "reprehensible," if I understand you correctly here.