Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pokerbuddy0
We'll just have to wait and see. I think far too much credence is given to Rosenberg's allegations. The feds didn't need her to point them in HF's direction. They were investigating many scientists and would have eventually got to him. Everyone keeps equating this with Richard Jewel, Ruby Ridge, Waco... This isn't the Reno Justice Department. This is probably the biggest case on Ashcroft's plate right now. I just don't see him putting it on the line to frame an innocent scientist.
49 posted on 05/12/2003 12:23:28 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: freeperfromnj
I think far too much credence is given to Rosenberg's allegations.

Her allegations, rather her "protrait" were important. She spoke privately with Senate staffers just before pressure was applied on the Justice Dept. In Hatfill's first speech he referred to her and her allegations - refuting allegations and querying why she would target him.

50 posted on 05/12/2003 12:36:49 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson