Posted on 05/12/2003 1:18:55 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:03:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bob Graham of Florida yesterday accused the Bush administration of "covering up" information vital to protecting the country against future terrorist attacks.
"This administration has probably been one of the most secretive administrations in American history. And one of the areas over which they have thrown a particularly heavy blanket has been information about terrorism, including terrorism [against] the United States," Mr. Graham said on CBS' "Face the Nation."
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
"there were 170 to 199 'acts of global terrorism' in 2002."There were no acts of terror in the United States, the United Kingdom or Australia, designated as special targets for the wrath of such outfits as al Qaeda."
Amir Taheri. "Terror's Fall." New York Post, May 12, 2003.
The worthless, mendacious, meritricious Democrats are reduced to (1) lying and making up "facts" and false accusations, (2) shouting maledictions, or (3) praising President Bush and crying, "Me too!"
They have nothing to offer.
Again??
How on earth did Bob Graham end up on a committee on Intelligence?
President Bush was in office less than 9 months on 911.
Sen. Graham had been in DC and on the Intel Committee how long? How long did it take to weaken our military?
Wonder if Sen. Graham's upset that Clinton waited until the day after the Electoral College elected George Bush President to demand new tough sanctions on the Taliban if they didn't hand over Bin Laden in 30 days (just in time for GW's Inaugeration)?
So much mischief unreported, so few honest mainstream reporters and Democratic Senators.
And what a difference it would make if the newsmedia reported truth rather than "Liberal"/Democrat propaganda.
This from a man who did not support, or even vote for the war on Iraq. Do you think Graham and his dem buddies would support a war against Syria? Yea right! I must admit I'm surprised though: it looks like the dems are actually recycling the 'Bush new' nonsense of about a year ago. They really are desparate and lack in anything that could be considered new in ideas.
To imply that this President allowed, by intent or neglect, the terrorist acts of 911 is low even for a Democrat.
To blame this administration for the actions of Osama Bin Laden and pals on 9-11, while giving the UN, EU, DNC (press, NGOs - VLWC) a pass is truly inviting WWIII. Would they stoop this low? Would anyone be surprised?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.