If you do, I'm in. Thanks for the post, Pokey.
Posted on 05/12/2003 12:50:14 AM PDT by Pokey78
PREDICTABLY, Ken Livingstone's remarks about the President of America have caused widespread outrage in the United States.
Ken called George Bush, "a repellent coward with a corrupt administration" (a bit rich coming from a repulsive dullard with an inept administration) and the Yanks are up in arms.
American tourist groups are cancelling their trips, American corporations are withdrawing investment from the UK and the British ambassador to Washington has been summoned, his pale knees knocking with terror, to a furious White House.
Actually, none of this is true. On the American radar, Livingstone registers slightly less than a speck of dirt on an amoeba's bum.
Americans have barely heard of Robbie Williams. They have never heard of David Beckham. They have forgotten all about George Michael.
So, in American terms, Ken Livingstone is a colossus of insignificance. I doubt if one retired American couple from Akron, Ohio, will be put off their trip to the birthplace of Shakespeare by Inconsequential Ken's remarks.
The Mayor of London received a lot of stick for putting at risk jobs that depend on tourism. But that assumes America is listening to him. And of course they are not.
America doesn't care what some shagged-out old socialist says about them. But should we?
Livingstone calls Bush a coward for not fighting in Vietnam. But I don't remember Red Ken strapping on his revolutionary beret to help Nicaragua's Sandinistas in their hour of need.
And why wasn't Green Ken standing on the barricades in Ulster when the Nationalist population were suffering under the jackboot of the British invaders?
There have been plenty of causes that Committed Ken cared about with bug-eyed passion. But he preferred to stay at home, stroking his newt.
If some stupendously obscure American politician called Tony Blair a Bible-bashing, mealy-mouthed, narcissistic mother, we wouldn't be outraged. We would be amused at his presumption that anyone cared what he thought. So it is with Ken Livingstone.
When you are a speck of dirt on an amoeba's behind, there is very little danger of you putting our tourist industry at risk. The issue is not really Ken Livingstone's knee-jerk anti-Americanism. It is the knee-jerk anti-Americanism of this entire country.
Only this week I received a letter from some intellectual giant telling me that Americans are arrogant, child-murdering, government-overthrowing, gum-chewing bastards. Anti-Americanism has increased in this country since the war with Iraq. Not because the peace camp were right about the number of civilian casualties. But because they were wrong. All the peacenik predictions - Iraq would be another Vietnam, the Middle East would erupt in flames, the civilian casualties would be beyond number - were totally wrong.
I know all about the CIA involvement in Pinochet's Chile. I have seen the pictures of children suffering from the effects of Agent Orange in Vietnam.
I have even been to the museum they have in Hiroshima, Japan, where there are photographs that you will never see in any Western newspaper.
I know America has blood on its hands. Which world power doesn't? Which empire doesn't? The British? The Russian? The Roman?
The more hysterical the anti-Americanism of Europeans becomes, the more I feel like John Wayne. America, for all its faults, is the world's best bet for freedom, democracy and peace.
At a time in history when religious fanatics think mass murder is rewarded in paradise with a life rather like Hugh Hefner's in the Playboy mansion, the world needs America like never before. Not all superpowers are evil. The British Empire was probably the most benevolent in history. We may have nicked a few old urns, but we left behind literacy, hospitals and the rule of law. That's not a bad deal.
If you can think of one country in Africa or Asia that was better off after the British Empire left, then answers on a postcard, please.
The United States of the 21st century is history's other benign superpower. The straws that the left clutch at - Pinochet, Vietnam - are increasingly receding into ancient history.
If Ken Livingstone, and all the little Yank-hating Livingstones just like him, truly believe George Bush and Saddam Hussein are indistinguishable, then they should try explaining that to the parents of the Iraqi children who were hung from lampposts because their dads shared a joke with British troops.
It is amazing to me that, in a world where religious nutters dream of slaughtering your family and mine, people waste their hatred on a country that, at best, exports freedom and democracy and, at worst, McDonald's and Starbucks.
George Bush may well be a cowboy. But increasingly I find myself asking what's so bad about cowboys?
Ken Livingston is not interested in the truth.
Stroking his newt?
If you do, I'm in. Thanks for the post, Pokey.
True. One word. Bataan.
Thanks for the ping to a good article.
*snicker*
Cowboys are cool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.