Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical Liability Crisis - North Florida Surgeons' Press Release
Press release, North Florida Surgeons ^ | May 8th, 2003 | North Florida Surgeons

Posted on 05/11/2003 4:10:45 PM PDT by eartotheground

North Florida Surgeons and the medical liability crisis At-a-glance • Not a protest, but our only option: North Florida Surgeons’ decision to close its doors May 2 was not our way of protesting, but the result of crushing economic realities – soaring claims, losses and premiums are threatening our survival. • A high-quality, experienced practice: North Florida Surgeons was formed in 1996 by combining the practices of about 20 established general surgeons with a combined 140 years of surgical experience. We are a good, veteran practice caught up in this crisis. • Filling a community need: In its eight years of operation, North Florida Surgeons has seen more than 88,000 patients and performed more than 107,400 procedures, many involving high-risk cases. The group also has provided about 30 percent of the on-call surgical coverage at the emergency rooms of area hospitals. • A small number of claims, yet huge losses: North Florida Surgeons has been sued 39 times for alleged malpractice, or in less than 1/10 of one percent of the procedures we’ve performed. We’ve never lost a case that has gone before a jury. Yet we’ve had to pay out more than $6.4 million in legal fees, settlement costs and reserves. • Claims rising sharply: Even though we have consistently performed high-quality surgeries, claims against our practice have steadily risen year-by year, from two in 1996 to a projected 12 this year. • Lawyers, not patients, received payments: Of the $6.4 million we paid out in medical liability cases, we estimate that nearly 70 percent was consumed by the legal system – only 30 percent went to the patients who alleged they were injured. • Nearly every surgeon sued: During our eight years in practice all but three of our surgeons have been sued at least once. This is an astronomically high percentage, given the veteran talent we have on staff. • Staggering premium increases: Between 2001 and 2002 alone, the annual medical liability premium paid by North Florida Surgeons skyrocketed from about $450,000 to more than $1.2 million. Although we’re paying three times as much for insurance, we now have one forth the amount of coverage. It’s not enough to adequately protect our physicians. • Few insurance options on horizon: Our insurer, TIG, recently informed us that continuing coverage is unlikely after June 30, and even if it is available, it will be substantially more expensive. • Insurers’ rates are justified: No one likes seeing their premiums triple in one year. However, our analysis shows the increases insurers sought our justified. Despite our good track record, insurers pay $1.88 in claims for every $1 in premium that we pay. • The Legislature must act now: The Florida Legislature let all citizens down by failing to fix the state’s broken medical liability system during the regular session. Now they must act in the May 12-27 special session. They must pass a comprehensive solution passed on the 60 recommendations of the Governor’s Task Force of independent university leaders. If they don’t, Florida is facing a medical meltdown, and many more situations like North Florida Surgeons.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: edwards; frist; frivolouslawsuits; healthcare; hillarycare; lawsuitabuse; liabilitycrisis; malpractice; medicine; surgeons; tortreform; trialattorneys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Savage Beast
good night bump
21 posted on 05/11/2003 7:27:30 PM PDT by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Many states require malpractice insurance as a condition of licensure. And almost all hospitals require it as a condition of staff membership.

I don't see how a whole state (much less an individual hospital) could resist a massive, coordinated refusal to carry malpractice insurance by even half its physicians.

A less satisfactory solution would be to carry the minimum allowable, and contribute any money saved to a legal defense fund to fight the trial lawyers on every single case. I think carrying a gold-plated malpractice policy just makes you that much fatter a target for the ambulance chasers.

-ccm

22 posted on 05/11/2003 11:08:49 PM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Many states require malpractice insurance as a condition of licensure. And almost all hospitals require it as a condition of staff membership.

I don't see how a whole state (much less an individual hospital) could resist a massive, coordinated refusal to carry malpractice insurance by even half its physicians.

A less satisfactory solution would be to carry the minimum allowable, and contribute any money saved to a legal defense fund to fight the trial lawyers on every single case, regardless of the merits. I think carrying a gold-plated malpractice policy just makes you that much fatter a target for the ambulance chasers.

-ccm

23 posted on 05/11/2003 11:11:12 PM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I was recently talking to a retired IRS Special Agent. He told me the very first person he visited as an Agent was a Woman Dr. who was making over a million a year. Her husband was also a Dr. and he was also making over a million and this was over 20 years ago. . . Many doctors are simply making a killing.

Oh that's cute. A single, second-hand anecdote from twenty years ago, and you feel justified in slamming doctors for "making a killing."

Let me be the first to inform you, Mr. Van Winkle, that in those twenty years, we have seen the rise of HMO's, whose very reason for existence is to cut payments to doctors. We have seen slashing cuts in Medicare and Medicad payments. We have seen vast increases in frivolous lawsuits and a corresponding increase in malpractice insurance.

A doctor making a million dollars a year is a distinct rarity. Practically all of them are plastic surgeons etc. who do elective procedures and insist on being paid up front, cash or credit card. This was true twenty years ago and remains true today.

Or perhaps they were crooks. Maybe that is why your IRS agent was investigating them.

In any case, it is certain that there are orders of magnitude more physicians earning less than $100,000 than those earning $1 million. Pediatricians and family doctors, the front line foot soldiers of medicine, have been particularly hard hit by all the cuts. Most of them would have been far better off financially, when you consider all their uncompensated years of training, if they had taken an apprenticeship in plumbing.

-ccm

24 posted on 05/12/2003 8:07:47 AM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
There is no mystery. The average income for a pediatrician is about $110,000. Family practice, slightly higher. Surgeons make more: average for an orthopedic surgeon is about $370,000. Spine surgeons more. Heart and brain surgeons probably average between 500k and a million.

What should they make? What does the typical malpractice attorney make in a year, and how does the training compare? Who does the most good?

25 posted on 05/12/2003 8:22:22 AM PDT by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson