[FairOpinion]

"Since you argue that these are WMD items my question and point is both damning and vital to ask: "If these were potential WMD items and a WMD site may I ask why we did not send our forces there to secure it from looters?"

---

Interesting that you don't ask THIS quesion:

"If these were KNOWN (by the IAEA, by their own admission) WMD items and a WMD site, why did the UN allowed these materials to stay under Saddam's control?"

[Destro]

Um----I thought the whole freaking point about invading Iraq was because the possibility was that the UN was not controling WMD (which was good enough for me)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So in we go fight all the way to Baghdad and....nothing! We secure the empty oil ministry building (it has vital records of oil sales and contracts stored there) yet we send not one platoon to secure this "potential WMD" site!! So who do we fire and courtmartial? The buck stops at Gen. Frank? Rumsfeld?